点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
泰安手艺人赶制五福糕点迎新年 守护“舌尖上的年味”******
(新春走基层)泰安手艺人赶制五福糕点迎新年 守护“舌尖上的年味”
中新网泰安1月11日电 题：泰安手艺人赶制五福糕点迎新年 守护“舌尖上的年味”
作者 刘小东 付刚 孙婷婷
将小麦细细研磨成粉、过筛，然后将小麦精粉分成两部分，一部分与水搅拌制成水皮，一部分与猪油混合，制成油酥芯，再将水皮、油皮均分成同样大小，把油皮包入水皮，擀成牛舌状，折叠两次，擀圆，包入以九蒸九晒传统工艺制作出的馅料……1月11日，泰山五福糕点传承人亓永利与其他糕点师傅正赶制五福糕点。
泰山五福糕点传承人亓永利正在制作糕点。 司刚 摄当天，在位于山东省泰安市的泰山五福糕点行生产车间内，一股香甜萦绕鼻尖。身穿统一工作服的几名工作人员正分工合作，制作出一盘盘诱人的糕点。在一处工作台上，一名糕点师傅正用精心雕刻的红木模具制作泰山五福糕点，从模具中压制出的糕点，造型各异，有葫芦、寿桃、鱼，以及带有福、禄、寿、喜、财等字样的糕点。
制作糕点使用的模具。 司刚 摄糕点压制成型后，放入烤盘烘烤。烤制出的糕点，饼皮雪白，口感软糯，满是麦香清新气息。
泰安手艺人制作的五福糕点。 司刚 摄在亓永利看来，泰山一带向来有浓厚的平安“福”文化，因此泰山五福糕点结合泰山文化，将“富贵、长寿、康泰、民安、善终”的五福文化融入，制作出了具有泰山饮食文化特色的泰山五福饼。
泰安手艺人将制作好的饼胚放入烤箱中。 司刚 摄“春节临近，我们制作的泰山五福糕点也进入了热销期，尤其是糕点蕴含着‘泰山五福’文化，非常受消费者青睐。”亓永利告诉记者，泰山区非物质文化遗产泰山五福糕点制作技艺制作出的产品有牛舌饼、蜜三刀、枣花饼、鸡蛋糕、宫廷桃酥等，造型均取自南宋古籍图画，并使用传承下来的红木模具纯手工制作。
泰安手艺人制作五福糕点所使用的芝麻、玫瑰花等食材。 司刚 摄“我们使用的模具，有家族传承下来的，也有四处收集来的，有的模具甚至有长达百余年的历史。这些模具制作精细，每一道纹路都是当年的糕点师傅精心雕刻，用这些模具制作出来的糕点样式精美。”亓永利介绍说，泰山五福糕点采用的原材料均为泰安当地特色农作物，如板栗、核桃、桃花、女儿茶、徂徕山散养山鸡蛋等，是地道泰安特产。
泰安手艺人制作的五福糕点。 司刚 摄“泰山文化博大精深，作为中式糕点的传承人，我将积极响应中式糕点复兴，继续深入挖掘泰山文化，坚持创造性转化、创新性发展。”亓永利称，他将把中式糕点制作和泰山文化结合，不断研发泰安本土特产，保护传承泰山饮食文化。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)